DIP 1020--Named Parameters--Community Review Round 1

[Andre Pany]

On Friday, 5 April 2019 at 00:17:02 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
> On Sunday, 31 March 2019 at 12:33:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> [...]
>
> There are a couple of versions a parameter in a function can be 
> syntactically appear:
>
> [...]

If we really want to go for a new named parameter syntax your 
syntax proposal looks the most reasonable so far.

1  no
2. I do not know
3. Yes. I would add following rule: after the first named 
argument, only named arguments can follow
4. Yes

Still thinking the struct initialization dip will cover 80% of 
the named parameter use case.

Kind regards
Andre