DIP 1020--Named Parameters--Community Review Round 1

[Daniel N]

On Sunday, 7 April 2019 at 12:35:34 UTC, bauss wrote:
> On Sunday, 7 April 2019 at 10:00:04 UTC, AltFunction1 wrote:
>>
>> I don't care personally about the feature but what does really 
>> worry me is that things like `@named` or any other syntactic 
>> changes tend to turn D into an incoherent language.
>>
>
> The day that named arguments has to have a special syntax in 
> the function definition is the day I will quit using D tbh.

Well, walter is on the same page.

Walter:
"I don't see much point in requiring the names, preventing use of 
names, nor aliasing them. This has never been an issue for struct 
initializers."

So you probably don't have to worry about that.