Has D failed? ( unpopular opinion but I think yes )

[Tourist]

On Sunday, 14 April 2019 at 13:08:36 UTC, Chris wrote:
> Another one is the eternal issue of autodecode - and now 
> there's talk of std.v2. Every time I come back to have a look 
> at what's going on in D, I think "Thank God I made the switch!" 
> Nowadays I spend more time writing new code (= new features = 
> happier users) instead of fixing / worrying about old code. D 
> may be a bit more stable now, as you say, but we can see 
> autodecode and std.v2 on the horizon. The calm before the storm.

As far as I understand std.v2 is meant to preserve compatibility 
not mess it up. It is a change of direction from changing to 
adding.