Does D have equivalent of Java util.concurrent?
Dibyendu Majumdar
d.majumdar at gmail.com
Sun Apr 28 10:11:51 UTC 2019
On Sunday, 28 April 2019 at 09:24:52 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> shared does nothing.
> There is strong desire to remove it, most people cast it away
> since its just a pain in the type system (ignoring its behavior
> of __gshared for globals).
>
> I think you're over thinking it.
>
> Yes you do need to use some form of memory synchronization
> strategy.
> No, the language does not force it.
> Yes the standard library does offer some solutions to this end.
> No, the language is by default unsafe and you're free to do
> anything you want including BSOD your computer. This is what
> native languages offer you.
Okay that's good )
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list