DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Final Review

[Mike Parker]

On Friday, 23 August 2019 at 13:23:22 UTC, Maximillian wrote:
> On Friday, 23 August 2019 at 11:24:25 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
>> I oppose the empty name feature...
>
> I'm wondering... this DIP say "Final Review" and in this topic 
> I see people complaining about some features like it was added 
> recently, and if this is the case than this DIP process is 
> broken.
>
> "Final" would be like an adjust here and there but for what I 
> see that's not the case here.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Max.

The feature was present in the previous revision and the DIP 
author decided not to remove it.

If you wish to discuss the DIP process further, please start a 
new thread. I will remind everyone to please keep comments in 
this thread focused on the DIP itself, as outlined in the 
document I linked in the first post:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/docs/guidelines-reviewers.md

I will be deleting any further off topic posts and pasting them 
into a separate thread.

Thanks!