preparing for named arguments

[aliak]

On Tuesday, 27 August 2019 at 07:35:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> If we don't end up with named arguments in the language, then 
> renaming the parameters in Phobos is a waste of time and 
> resources - not to mention a lot of pointless bikeshedding over 
> what the names should be. If we do get named parameters, the 
> DIP will almost certainly be accepted before anyone implements 
> the feature (potentially way before anyone implements it, since 
> DIPs that aren't implemented by the person proposing them tend 
> to not be implemented particularly quickly), so we can worry 
> about renaming stuff then.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Fair enough.