DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Final Review

[Kagamin]

On Tuesday, 27 August 2019 at 05:21:55 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> This all being said, you actually wrote a DIP. It's easy to 
> bash the concept when one has to consider only the concept, not 
> corner cases and specification. I don't agree with Andrei: 
> writing a DIP with argument reordering would be a major 
> undertaking, just as difficult and very possibly more so than 
> this one with all the corner cases to consider. We can't except 
> to easily find a champion for that.

It's not very obvious, but straightforward enough: when 
evaluating best match for named arguments, match parameters by 
name instead of position.