opMixin or mixin function templates with convenience operator?

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Friday, 13 December 2019 at 14:39:41 UTC, mipri wrote:
> That's impolite. I think what you've done here is also impolite.

What is impolite is to try to shoot down the relevance of having 
AST macros by pointing to Forth and Lisp. What are you trying to 
achieve by pointing to ancient languages that use cryptic 
identifiers for historic reasons?

AST macros are no worse than templates.

And certainly a lot better than string mixins!