DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 1

[12345swordy]

On Friday, 15 February 2019 at 17:38:23 UTC, Francesco Mecca 
wrote:
> On Friday, 15 February 2019 at 13:49:04 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>> [...]
>
> I think that the solution proposed by Atila is better for the 
> following reasons:
> 1. it is a library solution
> 2. allows both the user and the author of a library to specify 
> functions with named parameters
> 3. it is very lightweight
>
> [...]

You miss the other reason on why it is not enough: Compile time 
and run-time performance penalty.
-Alex