The DIP Process

[Nicholas Wilson]

On Thursday, 28 February 2019 at 02:49:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky 
(Abscissa) wrote:
> On 2/26/19 7:06 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>
>> Adding a fast-track revise-and-appeal seems a straightforward 
>> process revision.  If that were to be given a trial in this 
>> case as a goodwill gesture, do you think it might have a 
>> chance of de-grumpifying you?  (Obviously it's not in my hands 
>> to offer that, but raising the idea seems useful.)
>
> Sounds to me like the key is the lack of a "For the love of 
> ****, basic common sense shall always prevail over rigid 
> adherence to process!" amendment.

Indeed. A bit of common courtesy would go a long way too.