Named constructors

[Atila Neves]

On Sunday, 13 January 2019 at 20:59:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2019-01-10 15:00, Atila Neves wrote:
>
>
>> Currently I'm trying to work out an efficient way to interpret 
>> D to run unit tests so I don't have to pay the linker tax and 
>> just avoid compiling code whilst developing.
>
> LDC supports JIT.

I don't think that'd be useful for me. The only thing I care 
about is the latency between hitting a key and having feedback on 
my tests. It's rare that I have tests that would be significantly 
faster by optimising the machine code running on the CPU.

The main problem is that I don't really know, and can't unless I 
measure. Which means implementing it somehow. Sigh.