Would love to override default ctor of struct

[Alex]

On Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 10:05:22 UTC, Dru wrote:
> What is the idea behind why we can't define default ctor for 
> structs?
>
> In current situation I need to "@disable this()"
> then define a constructor with dummy arguments  (because my 
> constructor does not need arguments)
>
> It is a big pain on syntax

If your constructor doesn't need any arguments, what is the 
reason you can't define default values to your members?