using the compiler without GC

[bachmeier]

On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 at 05:41:43 UTC, evilrat wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 at 04:51:03 UTC, t wrote:
>>
>> i guess he ment:
>> i do not want to allocate memory with the gc, but use all d 
>> features. the resultant executable should not include a gc. as 
>> far as i know, thats not possible and thats why i don't use d.
>
> So what's the problem with simply avoiding quite short list of 
> features that may ever involve GC, and keep the GC without work?

Nobody has ever chosen a language because of a feature it didn't 
have. That wouldn't make sense. You can write dismissive comments 
about a language because of features you don't like but removal 
of features will never be a reason to use a language.