Why is vibe.d still performing bad in benchmarks?

[lagfra]

> There is some work on new version of this package (
> https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-http) , so maybe the performance of this new
> attempt will be better. I am goint to try this new vibe-http, but I am not
> sure if it is already in usable state.

The vibe-http repository is where HTTP/2 support is being worked on but it still
lacks some of the modules to allow for a complete vibe-d:http replacement.
The idea behind this repository is to rewrite parts of the vibe-d:http module
to follow these guidelines:

https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-http/wiki

I'm currently having little spare time to finish the modifications, but I'm
working on some benchmarks which will be focused on HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 as soon as
it is ready. At the moment the server supports HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 request
handling and response delivery, some functionalities are still missing (e.g.
the vibe-d:http fileserver module).