Could D have fit Microsoft's needs?
Chris
wendlec at tcd.ie
Tue Jul 23 11:28:28 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 23 July 2019 at 00:03:28 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
> Digital transformation is about adaptiveness and speed.
> Moore's Law is dead in economic terms and yet useful data sets
> might grow 10x in the next dozen years. I don't think there
> will be a shortage of people in coming years wanting to write
> fast code fast and some of those will use D. I've been saying
> this for a few years now and since then Mercedes, Audi and Weka
> are just a few of the notable adopters. I don't think people
> were expecting that to happen five years ago. These things
> take a long time.
Does the community / D Foundation have stats about the following
things:
1. How many companies (big or small) have stopped using D over
the years and why?
2. What do Netflix, Mercedes, Audi etc. use D for? In-house /
niche programs, R&D or big real world applications? E.g. do
command line tools that copy files count as "XYZ is using D now"
too?
3. Have they continued to use D or was it just a one-off to see
if it'd be a good option?
It's easy to drop names of big corporations, but it doesn't tell
us anything, really.
Also, I suppose a lot of companies / people who just dropped D
again wouldn't tell you because they a) couldn't be bothered or
b) out for courtesy.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list