Why Rust for safe systems programming?

Kagamin spam at here.lot
Mon Jul 29 09:16:24 UTC 2019


On Wednesday, 24 July 2019 at 06:51:36 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
> Yeah, things like `@nogc` and `-betterC` are kludgy to me. I 
> hope one day for an opt-in language where you just pay for what 
> you use without any special attributes or compiler switches.

@nogc serves a different purpose: it enforces restriction that 
you don't end up using a feature even if you accidentally try to.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list