Can we just have struct inheritence already?
Nemanja Boric
dlang at nemanjaboric.com
Thu Jun 13 14:31:08 UTC 2019
On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 13:32:05 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 08:24:38 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
> wrote:
>> No: the spec disagrees with the implementation, therefore at
>> least one of them is wrong. It does not immediately follow
>> that it is the spec that is in error.
>
> It's reasonable to say in this case that the spec is in error,
> because Walter has always been 100% clear that @safe refers
> only to memory safety, and the implementation reflects that
> intent.
Not really:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326
> tupleof is known to break through private access protections.
> It should probably not be allowed in @safe code.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list