Can we just have struct inheritence already?

[Tim]

On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 20:55:34 UTC, Exil wrote:
> This problem happens because you are used @trusted. If you used 
> @safe you wouldn't be able to increment pointers and modify the 
> values the way you did in @trusted.

The @trusted function behaves correctly if it receives valid 
input. The memory corruption only happens, because the @safe 
function passes a value, that is not expected by the compiler.