Struggling to implement parallel foreach...

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Monday, 17 June 2019 at 09:47:30 UTC, Manu wrote:
> I mean, if it comes to that... I really hope not.
> It would make it 100x harder to make the case to my company if 
> I start
> telling them that I couldn't produce a working demo without 
> forking the
> language :/

Is parallell for mandatory though? In C++ it is an add-on, isn't 
it?

Anyway, I am back to toying with creating a unicode-syntax.  
Stuff like inheriting structs could easily be handled on the 
syntactical level, so it does not require a fork, but things like 
parallell for has to be done at the semantic level.