The DIP Process

[Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)]

On 3/2/19 4:50 AM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 March 2019 at 03:51:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 3/1/2019 2:01 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
>>> Exactly.  With the current process everyone is doing alot of work and 
>>> producing no results.  We are proposing to change the process not to 
>>> save work, but to turn the work we are already doing into effective 
>>> results.
>>
>> Dip1016 is not "no result". It's clear that rvalues to ref parameters 
>> is the way forward. I'm now writing the DIP for it.
> 
> Out of all the things I said...you chose to respond to this?
> 
> I suppose I shouldn't be surprised...

Meh, as long as he agrees "rvalues to ref parameters is the way forward" 
and is working on a DIP, I'm satisfied.