[OT] Unity's HPC#
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Thu May 16 09:22:40 UTC 2019
On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 at 15:15:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 at 13:35:57 UTC, Margo wrote:
>
>> Talking about D for web development, simply does not work as
>> there is no interest here.
>
> Trying to make a push into the web space as a way to increase D
> usage is a complete waste of time. That is extremely
> competitive, with language after language doing the same
> things, and no hope for a new language to gain interest.
Well, there is hope for a new infrastructure to gain interest if
it is domain specific, but it isn't really making a good argument
for a general purpose language.
One such example is server-less event-driven websites running on
cloud-solutions. The language used in event handlers is less
important, could be javascript for that matter (e.g. Google
Functions). Although something domain specific probably would be
better.
Of course, a general purpose system level language is used for
implementing the infrastructure that enables this, but that is a
very small market.
On the other hand, a language that allows you to build domain
specific features on top of it, with ease, could offer something
unique.
Not really a B&W issue, but most, if not all, current languages
fails at that critical "with ease" requirement.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list