Named unittests

[Andre Pany]

On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 17:42:16 UTC, KnightMare wrote:
> On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 21:52:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
> wrote:
>> we need named unittests
>
> 4 years have passed. what the status of subj?

I am not sure wheter adding named unittests to the language give 
that much benefit.

Projects developers want to integrate unittest results into build 
pipelines and having nice reports which shows directly the source 
code of failing tests. The luxury version is e.g. that Jenkins 
sent in case of unittest failures an email to the relevant 
developers.

I use the dub package dunit. It is small, easy, without any 
dependencies and it creates an QUnit compatible XML report which 
opens all possibilities mentioned above.

Kind regards
Andre