[spec?] Traits

[bauss]

On Friday, 31 May 2019 at 05:29:16 UTC, Max Haughton wrote:
> Are the __traits considered to be part of the specification 
> proper? Do potential new traits need a DIP or do they go 
> straight into DMD + website?

If it's trivial then you probably don't need a DIP for it.

Usually DIPs are for "larger" or "more complex" implementations. 
AFAIK.

I have seen a few new __traits etc. added just with a simple PR 
and no DIP.

If the __traits has any breaking changes etc. then it would most 
likely need a DIP ofc.

-- Anyone can feel free to correct me on this though. --