Issue 1974 - What's your opinion?

[Paul Backus]

On Friday, 25 October 2019 at 01:20:02 UTC, kinke wrote:
> Allowing rvalues for an explicit opOpAssign!"+" call is IMO 
> fine, but not when using the operator, as that's just a leaking 
> implementation detail.

Making explicit opOpAssign!"+" and += work *differently* from 
each other seems like a really bad idea. Either they should both 
work for rvalues, or neither should.