bug in grammar with ?:

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Tuesday, 17 September 2019 at 18:03:20 UTC, Brett wrote:
> for(ulong i = len - 1; i >= (true) ? 0 : 1; i--)
> for(ulong i = len - 1; i >= ((true) ? 0 : 1); i--)

Those are two different things by design. The >= binds more 
tightly than the ?:, it lets you do stuff like

a > 0 ? "greater than" : "not greater than"


Thus the first  one is more like

if(i >= (true)) {
   return 0;
} else {
   return 1; {
}

and the second one is

if(i >= ((true) ? 0 : 1)


Though I personally like to use extra parens though just remember 
that true and (true) are no different, regardless of context - 
those parens are totally redundant..