DIP 1021--Argument Ownership and Function Calls--Final Review

[Sebastiaan Koppe]

On Wednesday, 18 September 2019 at 11:18:30 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> On 9/16/2019 11:23 AM, nkm1 wrote:
>> The problem with this DIP is it a part of some bigger picture 
>> (which includes DIP1000, DIP25 and probably other stuff) and 
>> it seems no one understands what this bigger picture is.
>
> The bigger picture is:
>
> https://dlang.org/blog/2019/07/15/ownership-and-borrowing-in-d/
>
> The smaller picture is that one cannot create a ref counted 
> objected that can safely expose a ref to its payload without 
> this proposal.

I, for one, like this DIP. Mostly because it signals me where 
Walter wants to take D, and I like the direction.