Structs are Not Plain: A call for empty struct constructors

[Max Samukha]

On Friday, 20 September 2019 at 06:01:00 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:

>
> The issue of whether with allows you to construct a temporary 
> that's valid for the entire scope of the with block is a 
> separate issue from whether D should be altered to have default 
> constructors. The OP just happened to use it in their example, 
> and it does currently seem to work even if the spec is silent 
> on the matter. Whether it ever gets changed to not work or the 
> spec gets updated to define its behavior is irrelevant to the 
> issue of default constructors.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Ok, I agree that the unspecified copy elision semantics is a 
separate issue.