VIbe.d / Hunt / Actix

[Daniel Kozak]

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:40 PM WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 21 September 2019 at 19:23:42 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
> > I´m starting to research about web frameworks for a future
> > project.
> > One of the main focus are on performance.
> >
> > So eventually i hit this site
> > https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/.
> >
> > And started to compare Vibe.d and Hunt performances (and also
> > another alternatives).
> > Vide.d in general are faster than Hunt, but i´m curious about
> > Actix (Rust) which are way faster (up to 10x on some
> > benchmarks).
> >
> > And i´m curious , from a technical point of view, how is
> > possible, since i don´t think there are any intrinsic qualities
> > that Rust have that cannot be achieved by D.
>
> I think in the benchmarks it's mostly bottlenecked by the
> database, which is why they improved so much in this round
> because of updates there.
>
> If you look at Plaintext and JSON Serialization (not using DB)
> you can see that while there is potential for improvement, it's
> not as drastic. Vibe.D's MongoDB isn't the most optimized one and
> not really the focus and the Postgres one seems to always be in
> front but also that probably needs improvements.
>
> I think the ones high in these text only benchmarks are the ones
> which extremely optimize for such plaintext cases. You can see
> simply nginx, the high performance load balancer / web server,
> being there with just 50%

No, the main issue is generaly with the basic http requests. db part
is not perfect, but main issue is even in plaintext