Nim programming language finally hit 1.0

[rikki cattermole]

On 30/09/2019 8:07 PM, JN wrote:
> I think D shouldn't be afraid to cut some of the language features which 
> aren't used much, or have a viable workaround. This way the language 
> would be smaller and easier to maintain/bugfix. Also, smaller language 
> means lesser chance of bugs occuring in the first place. Right now I 
> feel like D is in that weird spot. It's too afraid to cut or rework 
> existing features for language stability, but then is too brave 
> introducing new concepts which weren't battle-tested before.

I.e. hex strings