Discussion Thread: DIP 1028--Make @safe the Default--Final Review

[Timon Gehr]

On 04.04.20 09:01, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/27/2020 2:02 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> I don't know if we can reasonably change how @trusted is treated in name
>> mangling at this point, but I definitely think that it was a mistake to
>> distinguish between @safe and @trusted with name mangling.
> 
> If @trusted wasn't part of the mangling, one could not turn the mangling 
> back into the function signature.

Jonathan's more general point was that there is no reason to distinguish 
@safe and @trusted in function signatures. In fact, it would be an 
improvement if @trusted functions had @safe function signatures.