memory safety checks and trust

[Kagamin]

On Saturday, 11 April 2020 at 01:21:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> One of the nice things about D is that I very rarely feel like 
> I am fighting the language (unless I'm working under 
> constraints like -w and @safe pure nothrow @nogc stuff, but 
> that's why I just don't use those!). From low-level bit 
> twiddling to high level "just make it work", the D language 
> usually works with me, a few exceptions excluded - but when 
> those happen, you can cast or whatever to tell it to trust me.

Walter said there's now a third kind of safety for not annotated 
functions or something like that.