DIP 1027--String Interpolation--Final Review Discussion Thread
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Tue Feb 4 13:26:36 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 4 February 2020 at 12:47:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> As I expected, this was rejected, and Walter didn't understand
> what I was saying, says we shouldn't bake % into the format
> specification (it doesn't)
Yeah, this change actually lives up the DIP's own rationale while
making advanced uses doable.
Walter is wrong. We all need to stand united for these
enhancements and not back down.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list