DIP 1030--Named Arguments--Community Review Round 1 Feedback

[aliak]

On Thursday, 6 February 2020 at 06:09:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community 
> Review of DIP 1030, "Named Arguments".
>
> [...]

This was brought up in the discussion thread. But a consequence 
of this DIP is that parameter names in the standard library get 
set in stone. So maybe the DIP should mention that? Either as 
acceptable or provide a way to mitigate the issue?