DIP 1029---Add throw as Function Attribute---Community Review Round 1

[IGotD-]

On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 at 17:01:42 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>
> I don't even know if that's a good idea. All I'm asking for is 
> a sensible argument in favor of adding an inverse of one and 
> only one attribute. It makes absolutely no sense to me to have 
> negation of nothrow but not nogc.

I'm guessing that the reason is that one goal of this DIP was 
that it shouldn't have any breaking changes. However, if there is 
a future DIP for having "nothrow" as default, then it actually 
matters more.