Question regarding D v.0110

[Remi]

On Monday, 13 July 2020 at 13:33:45 UTC, Remi wrote:
> On Monday, 13 July 2020 at 12:25:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
> wrote:
>>
>> Though it depends on usage -- perhaps a Rand is useless 
>> without a seed set?
>>
>> As I suspected, the static ctor could easily be marked 
>> standalone (as in, it can't be part of a cycle, because it 
>> doesn't depend on any other module to run). This is quite 
>> frequently one of the biggest problems with D's static ctors.
>>
>> -Steve
>
> Interesting, is that a language feature? I found the "shared 
> static constructors" in the documentation which I think could 
> be used here and would achieve the same thing but might also be 
> covered by cyclicity checks, do you know?

I tried and got the same runtime error regarding cycling 
dependencies between static constructors/destructors.