GC/nogc status in docs
Ogi
ogion.art at gmail.com
Mon Jul 13 18:14:56 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 9 July 2020 at 12:55:45 UTC, aberba wrote:
> Has there been any consideration on tagging Phobos function as
> either GC or no-GC depending on how they behave for general
> awareness when reading the docs?
>
> I'm thinking it could be useful to know what you get.
I wonder how much of Phobos is not @nogc simply because of the
use of exceptions. Walter had some ideas that would allow
exceptions to work without GC. Is there any progress?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list