Inter-compiler portability of asm between gdc and ldc2 (and dmd)
Cecil Ward
cecil at cecilward.com
Wed Jul 15 00:26:13 UTC 2020
I have a fair amount of code written in D which uses GDC’s syntax
for inline asm and currently it is therefore GDC-only. It would
like people to be able to build it alternatively using LDC as
well, and maybe even DMD.
It’s a shame about the huge syntactic differences between the asm
syntax of GDC and LDC; both have their merits, but GDC seems to
me to be the most powerful, although I don’t pretend to have
studied LDC’s approach just glanced at it once very briefly.
I wish that the two could converge on a syntax that has the best
features of each. Alternatively perhaps I should be building
something that writes out the correct source code according to
which compiler is being used. There are rather too many ways of
going about such a thing.
Could anyone give me some advice about the pros and cons of the
various ways of dealing with this?
Has anyone for example done something using templates or
mixin-ful goodness generating code on-the fly?
Alternatively I could just give up and be forced to maintain two
parallel implementations of certain modules forever more,
provided there is zero runtime overhead, no cost in terms of
speed or bloat.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list