Getting action on your favorite D issues

Sat Jun 6 21:38:08 UTC 2020

On Saturday, 6 June 2020 at 21:01:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> The individual fields could have (possibly UFCS) trusted 
> semantics that are invalid when you arbitrarily set the data.

Doesn't that also apply to void-initialized values in the case 
that the implementation allows arbitrary bit-patterns (what IIUC 
the C99 standard calls trap values)?