Why do you continue to use D?

[12345swordy]

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 at 15:29:39 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 09.06.20 17:11, 12345swordy wrote:
>> ...
>> 
>> An idea that show no progress for what? Two years? I am losing 
>> my patience with this already. I can't consider d to be a 
>> serious language if this bug won't be fix in some reasonable 
>> time frame in the future.
>> 
>> -Alex
>
> I am not sure what you hope to accomplish with this rhetoric. 
> There seems to be a recent surge in people assuming that people 
> contribute to the language because they want it to be 
> "popular"/"serious"/...
> I highly doubt that this is the case and those messages clutter 
> the forums without adding anything interesting to discussions.

This is the first bug that I had encounter first hand when 
programming in d. An bug that hasn't been fixed in years!

It can be fix by having the druntime providing a interface say 
"Dispose" and just have the destroy function call that and leave 
the old deconstructors alone.

The fix itself is heavily inspired by c# language.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.idisposable.dispose?view=netcore-3.1