Is it time for D 3.0?

[NaN]

On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 04:04:21 UTC, Denis Feklushkin wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 00:19:57 UTC, NaN wrote:
>> On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 21:38:00 UTC, Denis Feklushkin 
>> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 19:50:44 UTC, NaN wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dont design based on imaginings of the future, you will 
>>>> almost always get it wrong.
>>>
>>> This is almost already reality, not future.
>>
>> I was responding to your statement regarding FPGAs. If they 
>> become ubiquitous, and if people want to use D to program 
>> them, and if someone does the work to make it happen, then 
>> maybe different width basic types *might* be needed.
>
> I do not suggest adding  or resizing types. I suggest name them 
> more correctly to exclude cause of confusion for people without 
> a beard :-)

I think you said something along the lines of... the FPGA are 
coming, they might have 6 bit bytes, so we should be prepared and 
start using a naming system that can accommodate that.

Im saying that you shoudnt base decisions on predictions like 
that because they are almost always wrong.