Documentation Improvement Initiative
Jan Hönig
hrominium at gmail.com
Wed May 6 07:12:22 UTC 2020
On Wednesday, 6 May 2020 at 05:25:59 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
> How about also cleaning up documentation how it looks on the
> web? Like missing macros are rendered blank in ddox, so the
> usage or the definition could get fixed. Example missing
> something: https://vibed.org/api/vibe.db.mongo.mongo/ (ending
> with "a dedicated utility for this called .", missing the
> $(LINK2 ...) macro)
>
> ddox also doesn't support showing mixin templates yet, which
> are however already reported in the JSON by the dmd
> documentation generator thing and only need some implementation.
>
> Also something I'm finding essential and think should be added
> to the DDoc spec: $(LREF) and $(REF) - they are used a lot in
> phobos and (a bit biased) they are also implemented in the
> code-d doc preview / code tips already for all packages, making
> them look nicely already there. Even if it just suggests that
> these are subject to implementation for each documentation
> generator, having a well defined syntax and explanation would
> help a lot.
Please add it to the wiki.
https://wiki.dlang.org/Documentation_improvement_initiative#The_List
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list