Tuples a first class feature, manu's new unary operator and named arguments
Panke
tobias at pankrath.net
Sun May 10 07:00:16 UTC 2020
On Sunday, 10 May 2020 at 03:14:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> I don't see any reason why the concept "multiple function
> arguments" should be separate from the concept "multiple tuple
> elements". It's a distinction without a difference and I think
> it is a design mistake.
But that would mean we need a way to prevent a tuple from
unpacking automatically, wouldn't it?
Or do we only allow exactly one or no tuple in an argument list?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list