D mentioned on Rust discussions site

[Dukc]

On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 11:21:51 UTC, Chris wrote:
>
> That's not the point. The point was that you treated him in a 
> way that made him lose faith in D and its leadership. There was 
> stonewalling and censorship which sounds familiar to me. My 
> point was that by treating him in this way, you lost a 
> contributor to and a proponent of D. Was it really worth it? I 
> get the impression that you don't really regret it, so somehow 
> you must think it was worth it, for what reason, I don't know.

Hm, what the point is, then? The first thought is that in your 
opinion is that the languge maintainers should more clearly admit 
some mistakes you think they have made.

But that can't be everything. If you were simply fed up with the 
langauge and it's leadership, you would just leave. There are 
thousands of screwed up projects at the Internet, and they are 
simply abandoned. What is it that is holding you here arguing for 
the sinking ship (as that is what D is judging by your posts)?