Recovering from DIP 1028
Bruce Carneal
bcarneal at gmail.com
Thu May 28 00:20:50 UTC 2020
On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 22:51:33 UTC, Clarice wrote:
> Some have mentioned implementing additional @safe checks into
> D-scanner. I'd imagine that's a better and more realistic
> approach than creating a DMD fork since it would also allow one
> to use just LDC and GDC, and it would be easier to maintain.
> With all said, I hope it doesn't come to that; instead, options
> 1) or 2) would happen.
> There's also this: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11176
I had not seen the pull request. It certainly appears preferable
to 3).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list