On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 16:27:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: > On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 14:56:14 UTC, Gregory wrote: >> >> There's a clear problem with the current DIP process. DIP1028 >> has made that clear. > > I disagree. The process itself is working as intended. Which is why the process is problematic and needs to be changed.