@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form

[Mike Parker]

On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 11:14:31 UTC, Gregory wrote:

>
> Not that different. All the more reason for the DIP process to 
> be fixed than leave it the way it is. You are just arguing 
> semantics at this point to try and avoid bad PR. You care more 
> about public imagine than due process. That's backwards.

Well, for one, caring about D's image is part of what I do. For 
another, I'm not arguing against changes to the decision-making 
process (or changes to any part of the DIP process), so I really 
don't know what you're on about.