@safe/DIP1028 explained in meme form

[Mike Parker]

On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 13:12:22 UTC, Gregory wrote:

>
> So there's no problem with the process, but you aren't against 
> fixing the process? Which is it?

If you read my previous posts in this thread, I have said I don't 
believe the process is currently broken. But I also said this:

"I'm happy to discuss changes to the DIP process and I'm willing 
to make them if I can be convinced they're needed. I've done it 
before. We all want the best process we can have."

https://forum.dlang.org/post/eeiijnpjevxwlfesccnb@forum.dlang.org

So, yes, it really is both. I don't see a problem in the process 
now, but I'm open to making changes that are in my purview if 
someone convinces me there *is* a problem or has ideas on how to 
improve it.