Better branding of -betterC
Paulo Pinto
pjmlp at progtools.org
Tue Nov 3 10:37:05 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 3 November 2020 at 10:25:15 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 November 2020 at 06:04:26 UTC, norm wrote:
>>
>> Just going to pick on this para. sorry :)
>>
>> I hear this a lot and it is simply not true. Working in
>> embedded for the last ~18yrs (automotive and medical) every
>> project since 2010 I know of is C++. At conferences and the
>> like over the last 2-3yrs there is a lot of talk about Rust
>> and people are starting to mention MicroPython for
>> prototyping. But as a whole everyone I talk to is looking
>> forward to upgrading their C++ compilers on the next project
>> to get C++20 features.
>>
>> Every C++ embedded project I have ever seen has exceptions
>> turned off.
>
> It's funny that they talk about C++20 in the embedded
> environment but many features cannot be used because of STL.
> STL is just like phobos and will become just as big if you
> statically link with it. Turning exceptions off also means that
> many parts of the STL library will be dysfunctional. Usually
> you need specialized libraries.
>
> Modern C++ is even more of a mess because they have moved much
> of the functionality to the STL library. std::move for example
> is a library template, which can be duplicated outside of
> course but still you need to do that with a lot of functions.
> Even statically compiled primitives are library templates today
> with some inunderstandable implementation underneath. STL is
> this big blob that can include all sort of things that you
> don't expect even for simple primitives.
>
> Apart of a the ugliness of modern C++, many of the modern
> features are implemented in such a way it is difficult to make
> it freestanding from STL. You do not want STL in embedded
> systems.
>
> Is modern C++ good for embedded systems? No, you need to slice
> of half of the new features because of the reasons I mentioned
> above.
To be fair same applies to C, hence C89 + OEM extensions.
In some domains even C11 is a challenge regarding adoption, as
per the reports I usually read.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list