DCD - Improving the tooling
    Ethan 
    gooberman at gmail.com
       
    Sat Nov 21 16:42:15 UTC 2020
    
    
  
This came about naturally during Robert's talk, and discussing 
how good UFCS is. Because UFCS is great and I use it extensively. 
But it can be difficult to use for people used to modern IDEs for 
one very good reason: DCD doesn't include UFCS in its 
autocomplete.
The purpose of this thread is to highlight that we should look at 
improving DCD here. Initially about UFCS, but I'm certain there's 
a bunch of other stuff that needs improving. So please go ahead 
and highlight what you think should be improved.
The conversation went a bit like this (the magic of copy/paste):
FeepingCreature
I unqualifiedly love ufcs and dropping parentheses
Dennis Korpel
Biggest problem with UFCS for me is that DCD doesn't 
auto-complete it
TheRealGooberMan
That's certainly a tooling problem, not a language problem. 
Which makes that a very solvable problem
Dennis Korpel
I know, but it does affect how I write code
Per Nordlöw
dcd ufcs autocompletion, yes pleeease. why is this so hard to 
add?
Per Nordlöw
jump to ufcs-function definition in dcd would be even easier and 
a feature I miss even more
TheRealGooberMan
This feels like we should make a forum thread about improving DCD
TheRealGooberMan
The value proposition is high
Per Nordlöw
yes please
    
    
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list