proposal: short => rewrite for function declarations
Andre Pany
andre at s-e-a-p.de
Fri Oct 9 17:40:56 UTC 2020
On Friday, 9 October 2020 at 14:44:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> After a brief chat yesterday, I slapped this together:
>
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11833
>
> In short, in a function declaration, it rewrites `=> ...;` into
> `{ return ...; }`
>
> One benefit is shorter property accessors:
>
> private int _x = 34;
> @property x() => _x;
> @property x(int v) => _x = v;
>
> But it also works basically anywhere
>
> bool isNull() => this is null;
> auto identity(T)(T a) => a;
> @property y() in(true) => _x; // contracts still work too
>
> So it just extends the existing lambda shorthand to full
> declarations too.
>
> See more in the PR description and the test case there.
If I remember correctly, the property setter in your example
works, because the assignment _x = v returns an int.
In case you do not assign the value but call a method which has
return type void, it won't work? (As far as I remember).
Overall I like your proposal.
Kind regards
Andre
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list